When I began grading the papers, I didn't want to be too critical. No one likes getting back a paper that is covered in red marks, and as this was basically my students’ first attempt at writing, I didn’t want to undermine their efforts. My CT and I agreed that it was best to focus on the positives for this first paper, instead of correcting every single mistake. This paper will serve as a learning process, a baseline we can use to decide what elements of an essay we need to focus on.
As I was writing this post I came across an article by Brian Slusher that addressed the exact problem I was facing. I didn’t want to be too critical, but I also wanted to make sure my students knew what they needed to improve. His article, titled “Praising, Questioning, Wishing: An Approach to Responding to Writing,” gave me a lot of great tips for responding to student writing. As evident by the article's title, Slusher encourages readers to use the Praise, Question, Wish model of response to help writers. He states, “Praise, Question, and Wish solves these dilemmas of tone by adopting positive language that strengthens the writer's confidence, while empowering him to take control of his piece.”
Through this model of response, writers are able to see what you appreciated about their writing, which generally motivates them to want to continue to write. This model also works for teachers, because it allows for the ability to give constructive feedback that can help students continue to improve, without returning a paper full of red marks. I really liked the wish part of this model, because, as Slusher states, “Since many writers are sensitive about receiving advice, it is a good idea to avoid sounding like you are directing their piece. The word wish has a positive connotation, so starting your advice with I wish avoids the tone of a command. For example, ‘I wish you would tell more about the horse.’” This allows the response to seem more like a conversation than an order.
I’m hoping that as I continue to teach my students how to format an essay, the papers I get will only continue to improve. I have a very intelligent, hardworking class, so I know this will be the case. I can’t wait to read more papers! I told a student this and he looked at me like I was crazy, and then said, “If I had to read that many papers I’d probably fall asleep.” Funny kid.
I love my students and I love my school. This year just keeps getting better!
Natalie, I appreciate your desire to look for the good in your students' writing and to meet them where they are. Your and your CT's plan to assess their work to determine how to best help your students with their writing sounds ideal, and I'm willing to bet that you're going to find some productive ideas related to writing instruction and responding to student writing in the next three weeks of readings for our class. Randy Bomer and Peter Smagorinsky have some dynamic and motivating ideas for both students and teachers. Thanks for your thoughtful post!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNatalie:
ReplyDeleteI loved your blog. I agree that students’ first papers should not be critical but positive. Positive remarks start a good report approach and allow students to engage more in the future. This allows an incentive to write more. Then as your students’ progress in their writing, you can increase your correcting. This I feel would best be accomplished by giving your students a rubric from which they know what to expect from your grading. Each rubric you can include more defined criteria you want from your students. There is a site called, “Enhance Reading, Writing, and Critical Thinking”. This site shows Bloom’s Taxonomy for critical thinking and how to establish student engagement. I really liked the way you went and researched this issue. In addition, I really like the approach of “Praise, Question, and Wish” to solve this dilemma. I will remember this article.
Further, I would like to suggest that you might include peer evaluations. This is accomplished with pre-establish criteria from which you look for, give your comments or suggestions, ask questions, and tell what you like. This allows students to challenge themselves looking for others errors, and in so learn themselves. To approach this you will have to promote lessons on how to peer edit. I would suggest a site you may wish to look at. (crt.ucmerced.edu/sites/crte/files/public/documents/Engaging Students Through Peer Reviews Final.pdf.
Good luck and let me know how your future lessons turn out.
Pat Strelow, 10/3/2012
I know what you mean,it is a fine line sometimes between being critical and overly critical or not critical enough. I still have problems when I grade. I want to stay postive but I still want my students to learn what they are doing wrong.
ReplyDeleteGrowing up, we always took our papers to our mom, the teacher. Our grammer was so bad we would just refer to it as having her "bleed" on the paper. She used a red pin when she would look it over and she always gave it back with a whole lot of red marks, which made it look, sometimes, like she had bled all over the paper.
Always try to find that happy medium and I hope you keep seeing progress in your student's writing. They can only get better!!